🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to restart nuclear talks with Washington on condition that it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has stated.

Abbas Araghchi declared only diplomacy worked, and revealed new appeals had originated from go-betweens to reopen talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran could not yet allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect bombed nuclear sites for safety concerns.

Navigating a Complex Route

Araghchi is treading a difficult course since Iran wishes not to be perceived to be acting from a stance of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen stronger in military terms and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to enrich uranium on home soil that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Previous Talks Abruptly Ended

The prior phases of discussions between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, attacked Iran's enrichment centers in a 12-day war that ended with the US president declaring the sites had been obliterated. Afterward, European countries used their right to restore UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Iran's diplomats claimed they felt they had attained a "ideal resolution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was decided an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the talks that US nuclear scientists could work on Iranian soil, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Officials stated three times they had secured an understanding with Washington's diplomat the US official only for the agreement to collapse due to "detractors in America".

Present Position

Tehran representatives declared the cooperative arrangement was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the offer could be revived in some form if talks reopen.

The American leader recently claimed he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but privately Iran's diplomats say they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from Washington either directly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iranian foreign ministry has been criticized of non-responsiveness in the aftermath of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Position

In his remarks to the gathering, aimed to paint the US as a dominant force that abuses the idea of worldwide standards, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement revealed the dispute could not be ended by armed force. He asserted the attacks commenced with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and concluded with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with full US knowledge and collaboration, making trust challenging to rebuild.

Negotiations Stays the Final Solution

Araghchi stated: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted diplomacy; it was the United States and the western countries that had repeatedly sought to dictate their desires during the negotiations. Dialogue can still be alive and remains the ultimate answer to settle disputes, but its standards, rules and tenets must be respected."

"Provided that they talk to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of respect and honor, they will obtain a answer in the equivalent language."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of repair and reconstruction, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We gained many lessons from this war; we have come to know our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the adversary."

He stated: "We successfully passed this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and gear, if eliminated, will be rebuilt; what is essential is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but failed to shatter. The Iranian people have developed stronger, more integrated, and more supportive of the leadership and the country in the wake of this attack."