🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to prohibit social platforms access for young people below 16 is sparking debate worldwide. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and guardians are watching with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a increasing group of states are moving toward parallel bans.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for under-15s, with the leader arguing that phones and networks are "stealing our children's innocence". A law could be enacted next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a minimum age limit of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a digital ID system to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Authorities have stated that an Australian-model ban could be "a potential tools in reserve".
• In Spain, the president has asked parliament to enact a proposal raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for those under fifteen, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has advised guardians to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has approved a non-binding motion demanding a ban for minors without guardian approval is granted. Although it warns of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the step does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a good starting point," commented the parliamentarian supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a potential ban, stating that "no measure is off the table" but stressing any policy must be "supported by conclusive data".

Earlier, interest built behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually watered down. However, the administration committed to further research the issue.

Campaign organizations have raised apprehensions. One foundation established by the family of a girl who took her own life after viewing dangerous social media material contends that a blanket age ban might not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the refusal of the tech sector to build products and services that are appropriate and fit for young users," said a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, action is primarily unfolding at the state level against a backdrop of country-wide stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a bill prohibiting children under fourteen from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping minors to 60 minutes of social media use per day, with extra time requiring parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted laws requiring parental consent for minors to open social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from certain politicians to copy this example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Outside of these regions, further states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for Instagram to 16.

Yet, international organizations strike a more nuanced stance. A major UN agency has advised that blanket prohibitions pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The body highlights that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to improve user protection.

While this worldwide conversation evolves, the actions of this nation and several other countries show that states internationally are no longer willing to delay for the industry to self-regulate.